| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
16/10/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
15/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
CUBBAGE, F.; KOESBANDANA, S.; MAC DONAGH, P.; RUBILAR, R.; BALMELLI, G.; MORALES OLMOS, V.; DE LA TORRE, R.; MURARA, M.; HOEFLICH, V.A.; KOTZE, H.; GONZALEZ, R.; CARRERO, O.; FREY, G.; ADAMS, T.; TURNER, J.; LORD, R.; HUANG, J.; MACINTYRE, C.; MCGINLEY, K.; ABT, R.; PHILLIPS, R. |
|
Afiliación : |
FREDERICK CUBBAGE, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; SADHARGA KOESBANDANA, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; PATRICIO MAC DONAGH, Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNAM), Misiones, Argentina; RAFAEL RUBILAR, Universidad de Concepción, Concepcioón, Chile; GUSTAVO DANIEL BALMELLI HERNANDEZ, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; VIRGINIA MORALES OLMOS, Weyerhaeuser Company, Melo, Uruguay; RAFAEL DE LA TORRE, CellFor, USA; MAURO MURARA, Universidade do Contestado, Santa Catarina, Brasil; VITOR AFONSO HOEFLICH, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil; HEYNZ KOTZE, Komatiland Forests (Pty) Ltd, South Africa; RONALDS GONZALEZ, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; OMAR CARRERO, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; GREGORY FREY, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA; THOMAS ADAMS, New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd., New Zealand; JAMES TURNER, New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd., New Zealand; ROGER LORD, Mason, Bruce, & Girard, Oregon, USA; JIN HUANG, Abt Associates, USA; CHARLES MACINTYRE, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; KATHLEEN MCGINLEY, n International Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service, USA; ROBERT ABT, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; RICHARD PHILLIPS, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA. |
|
Título : |
Global timber investments, wood costs, regulation, and risk. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2010 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Biomass and Bioenergy, 2010, v. 34, no. 12, p. 1667-1678 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.05.008 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 10 November 2009 / Received in revised form 31 March 2010 / Accepted 31 May 2010. / Available online 29 June 2010. |
|
Contenido : |
We estimated financial returns and wood production costs in 2008 for the primary timber plantation species. Excluding land costs, returns for exotic plantations in almost all of South America e Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela, and Paraguay e were substantial. Eucalyptus species returns were generally greater than those for Pinus species in each country, with most having Internal Rates of Return (IRRs) of 20% per year or more, as did teak. Pinus species in South America were generally closer to 15%, except in Argentina, where they were 20%. IRRs were less, but still attractive for plantations of coniferous or deciduous species in China, South Africa, New Zealand, Indonesia, and the United States, ranging from 7% to 12%. Costs of wood production at the cost of capital of 8% per year were generally cheapest for countries with high rates of return and for pulpwood fiber production, which would favor vertically integrated firms in Latin America. But wood costs at stumpage market prices were much greater, making net wood costs for open market wood more similar among countries. In the Americas, Chile and Brazil had the most regulatory components of sustainable forest management, followed by Misiones, Argentina and Oregon in the U.S. |
|
Palabras claves : |
EUCALYPTUS; FINANCIAL MODELS; FOREST PLANTATIONS; INVESTMENT RETURNS; PINUS; RISK. |
|
Thesagro : |
FORESTACIÓN. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/3567/1/Balmelli-2010-Biomass.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02586naa a2200469 a 4500
001 1051156
005 2019-10-15
008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.05.008$2DOI
100 1 $aCUBBAGE, F.
245 $aGlobal timber investments, wood costs, regulation, and risk.
260 $c2010
500 $aArticle history: Received 10 November 2009 / Received in revised form 31 March 2010 / Accepted 31 May 2010. / Available online 29 June 2010.
520 $aWe estimated financial returns and wood production costs in 2008 for the primary timber plantation species. Excluding land costs, returns for exotic plantations in almost all of South America e Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela, and Paraguay e were substantial. Eucalyptus species returns were generally greater than those for Pinus species in each country, with most having Internal Rates of Return (IRRs) of 20% per year or more, as did teak. Pinus species in South America were generally closer to 15%, except in Argentina, where they were 20%. IRRs were less, but still attractive for plantations of coniferous or deciduous species in China, South Africa, New Zealand, Indonesia, and the United States, ranging from 7% to 12%. Costs of wood production at the cost of capital of 8% per year were generally cheapest for countries with high rates of return and for pulpwood fiber production, which would favor vertically integrated firms in Latin America. But wood costs at stumpage market prices were much greater, making net wood costs for open market wood more similar among countries. In the Americas, Chile and Brazil had the most regulatory components of sustainable forest management, followed by Misiones, Argentina and Oregon in the U.S.
650 $aFORESTACIÓN
653 $aEUCALYPTUS
653 $aFINANCIAL MODELS
653 $aFOREST PLANTATIONS
653 $aINVESTMENT RETURNS
653 $aPINUS
653 $aRISK
700 1 $aKOESBANDANA, S.
700 1 $aMAC DONAGH, P.
700 1 $aRUBILAR, R.
700 1 $aBALMELLI, G.
700 1 $aMORALES OLMOS, V.
700 1 $aDE LA TORRE, R.
700 1 $aMURARA, M.
700 1 $aHOEFLICH, V.A.
700 1 $aKOTZE, H.
700 1 $aGONZALEZ, R.
700 1 $aCARRERO, O.
700 1 $aFREY, G.
700 1 $aADAMS, T.
700 1 $aTURNER, J.
700 1 $aLORD, R.
700 1 $aHUANG, J.
700 1 $aMACINTYRE, C.
700 1 $aMCGINLEY, K.
700 1 $aABT, R.
700 1 $aPHILLIPS, R.
773 $tBiomass and Bioenergy, 2010$gv. 34, no. 12, p. 1667-1678
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
19/10/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
19/10/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CASTILLO, A.; CABRERA, D.; RODRIGUEZ, P.; ZOPPOLO, R. |
|
Afiliación : |
ALICIA MARIA CASTILLO SALLE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS DANILO CABRERA BOLOGNA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO ANDRES RODRIGUEZ BRUNO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ROBERTO JOSE ZOPPOLO GOLDSCHMIDT, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Response of pear rootstocks micropropagated in solid medium and in temporary immersion bioreactors. (Conference paper). |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Acta Horticulturae, July 2020, 1285, 147-152. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1285.23 |
|
ISBN : |
978-94-62612-83-9 |
|
ISSN : |
0567-7572 (print) // 2406-6168 (electronic) |
|
DOI : |
10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1285.23 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Published July 2020. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1285: XXX International Horticultural Congress IHC2018: II International Symposium on Micropropagation and In Vitro Techniques. Symposium Istanbul (Turkey), August 12, 2018. Conveners and Editors: M. Lambardi, Y. Yalçın Mendi, E.A. Özüdoğru. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Pear is one of the most important temperate fruit crops. To propagate a reasonable number of plants in the shortest possible time, different in vitro multiplication systems were evaluated: solid media and temporary immersion bioreactors with two different cultivation media in each system. Automation of micropropagation in bioreactors has been considered as a possible way of reducing propagation cost, but it depends upon better understanding of physiological and biochemical responses of plant to the culture microenvironment and an optimization of specific physical and chemical culture conditions to control the morphogenesis of pear plants in these systems. The conventional media of Murashige and Skoog (MS) was compared with an enriched media in three elements: calcium, magnesium and potassium, where the normal amount of those elements in the MS was increased 2.5 times. In all of the cases 4.44 µM of benzyladenine was used. In solid medium, significant differences in plant high were observed; the best plant size was achieved with the media enriched with salts compared with conventional composition (MS conventional). The highest multiplication rate (24) was observed in temporary immersion bioreactors with media enriched with salts, while the lowest was in solid media with MS conventional composition (4). In none of the cases was hyperhidricity observed.
@ International Society for Horticultural Science. |
|
Palabras claves : |
Calcium; Hyperhidricity; Magnesium; Potassium. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02579naa a2200253 a 4500
001 1061419
005 2020-10-19
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978-94-62612-83-9
022 $a0567-7572 (print) // 2406-6168 (electronic)
024 7 $a10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1285.23$2DOI
100 1 $aCASTILLO, A.
245 $aResponse of pear rootstocks micropropagated in solid medium and in temporary immersion bioreactors. (Conference paper).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Published July 2020. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1285: XXX International Horticultural Congress IHC2018: II International Symposium on Micropropagation and In Vitro Techniques. Symposium Istanbul (Turkey), August 12, 2018. Conveners and Editors: M. Lambardi, Y. Yalçın Mendi, E.A. Özüdoğru.
520 $aABSTRACT. Pear is one of the most important temperate fruit crops. To propagate a reasonable number of plants in the shortest possible time, different in vitro multiplication systems were evaluated: solid media and temporary immersion bioreactors with two different cultivation media in each system. Automation of micropropagation in bioreactors has been considered as a possible way of reducing propagation cost, but it depends upon better understanding of physiological and biochemical responses of plant to the culture microenvironment and an optimization of specific physical and chemical culture conditions to control the morphogenesis of pear plants in these systems. The conventional media of Murashige and Skoog (MS) was compared with an enriched media in three elements: calcium, magnesium and potassium, where the normal amount of those elements in the MS was increased 2.5 times. In all of the cases 4.44 µM of benzyladenine was used. In solid medium, significant differences in plant high were observed; the best plant size was achieved with the media enriched with salts compared with conventional composition (MS conventional). The highest multiplication rate (24) was observed in temporary immersion bioreactors with media enriched with salts, while the lowest was in solid media with MS conventional composition (4). In none of the cases was hyperhidricity observed. @ International Society for Horticultural Science.
653 $aCalcium
653 $aHyperhidricity
653 $aMagnesium
653 $aPotassium
700 1 $aCABRERA, D.
700 1 $aRODRIGUEZ, P.
700 1 $aZOPPOLO, R.
773 $tActa Horticulturae, July 2020, 1285, 147-152. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1285.23
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
